Yesterday, SquareTrade published an iPhone4 study that revealed the iPhone 4's glass was more vulnerable than iPhone 3gs'.
Media across America picked up on the study and we would like to share with you their perspectives and hopefully get your thoughts in return too.
CNN Tech: " The iPhone 4 may be an attractive gadget, but keeping it looking good can be a high-maintenance task."
MSNBC Tech
nology : "Though there's some ambiguity, the report's bottom line is clear: "The evidence suggests that the iPhone 4 is more vulnerable to physical damage than its predecessor."
Gizmodo: "W
hen the iPhone 4 was revealed, it was obvious that its design was more fragile than the previous generation: If you double the glass panes, the accidental shattering rate will increase too. Now there is data to confirm this theory."
The Sydeny Morning Herald : " SquareTrade analysed mishaps involving more than 20,000 iPhone 4 models and found that screens broke 82 per cent more often than was the case with the iPhone 3G."
You can read other media perspectives here, here, and here. Do share with us what you think of the study.
